Andy Piper <andyp(a)parallax.co.uk> writes in xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org:
At 02:27 03/12/98 -0800, SL Baur wrote:
> Even if true, it is no excuse for XEmacs package installation to puke
> its guts out.
I'm not sure I understand, but I probably agree :) Failure of
gzip or tar
seems quite high in the list of things that could fail during package
installation so we should cope somehow.
My point was that no matter how disk sizes have increased in recent
years, they are still of finite size and may be filled close to
capacity when XEmacs packages are being installed.
The steady state of disks is full.
-- Ken Thompson
Truth be told, I'm (somewhat) less worried about filling disks than
overflowing quota, but the effects on the user are identical and the
steps XEmacs has to take to not puke and die are the same.
...
So you need 7Mb slack for installation - seems not unreasonable to
me. I
guess the best thing to do would be to check how much space is actually
free and act accordingly.
Right.
Ultimate paranoia would account for the possibility that it may not
be possible to install a newer package because it is bigger than the
previous one.
Right. I like this train of thought. Excellent. :-)