New subject: ?????

Monday, 8 June 1998

        Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr&gt; writes:

...
 Didier Verna <verna(a)inf.enst.fr&gt; writes:

 > It doesn't contain the simplest reference to the message that
 > produced the error. Not even a reminder of the subject line or
 > something.

 OK, now we at least have something to work with. 
	Note that this remark was in my first message already.

...
 When one is posting to a patches-only no-discussion mailing list,
why
 should it be so strange that the robot moderator rejects the message? 
	I never said it was strange.

...
 In the first incarnation, the robot would reject the message with
_no_ 
 feedback.  This is much better, so we *do* give a damn what he says
 apart from diff -u. 
	Much better, I wouldn't go that far ...

...
 > There could be a more friendly message instead, like "This
list is
 > for patches only. If your message contains a bug report or general
 > comments on xemacs, please try xemacs-beta", but not just "You
 > lost. Try again."

 I'll ask Kyle to implement this. 
It's been a while since she posted something here. Did she leave the list ?

-- 
    /     /   _   _       Didier Verna        http://www.inf.enst.fr/~verna/
 - / / - / / /_/ /      E.N.S.T. INF C214        mailto:verna＠inf.enst.fr
/_/ / /_/ / /__ /        46 rue Barrault        Tel.   (33) 01 45 81 80 72
                      75634 Paris  cedex 13     Fax.   (33) 01 45 81 31 19

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

Re: ?????