Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof(a)math.ethz.ch> writes:
#7 0x8122e65 in signal_after_change (buf=0x857e6b8, start=0,
orig_end=1,
new_end=0) at /scratch/vroonhof/xemacs/src/insdel.c:2291
I don't understand how start ends up being 0, short of a memory
corruption.
P.S. Shouldn't bufcons and buffer be gcproed?
I don't think so. bufcons maps over the list of indirect children,
which is GC-safe.