Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor] writes:
>>>>> "Robert" == Robert Pluim
<rpluim(a)bigfoot.com> writes:
Robert> SL Baur writes:
>> I now suspect dumping. I hate dumping, I hate it, I hate it, I hate
>> it, I hate it. Why must we do something so stupid?
Robert> Here's a (possibly insane) suggestion: rather than dumping, why don't
Robert> we compile the lisp files to C? We could then make select portions
Robert> dynamically loadable, and remove all that unportable dumping code.
This would not solve the problem: The dumped image does not just
contain code, it contains a good amount of state as well.
Ah, I'd forgotten about that.
Robert> Does this sound feasible, or have I been getting too little sleep
Robert> lately?
It's feasible, but it would probably not get you much benefit.
Faster execution of the core lisp code?
Besides, I doubt there's anyone around to actually do it.
<grin> I was merely suggesting, not volunteering.
Robert
--
The above are my opinions,
and my opinions only.