Let's get some more opinions. Moving to xemacs-beta from xemacs-patches. Michael Sperber writes: We surely don't need both "simple-more.el" and "subr-more.el". (In fact, I mistook one for the other already. I prefer the name "simple-more"; I can't see any reason why the functions currently in subr-more.el would ever be considered "primitives." But that would be more work for you (or whoever adds the simple-more functions) since I think at least one package already requires simple-subr. BTW, subr-more.el sucks. The docstring of `number-sequence' displays a complete misunderstanding of floating point arithmetic. (Floating point *arithmetic* is *not* "inexact"; it's that many numbers that can be exactly represented with decimal numerals cannot be exactly *represented* as binary floating point numbers in the computer). `string-match-p' uses `match-data' and `store-match-data' rather than `save-match-data' (may be safer since it uses an unwind-protect). `add-to-history' is broken, it uses delete on a list without a set. N.B. The relevant sexp in our `read-from-minibuffer' does it right. I'm also not sure I agree with `add-to-history's logic, but it's not too bad, and I think I know how to improve it bug-compatibly. I'll try to get around to fixing and pushing by the weekend, but no promises. _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta