Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
Andy Piper <andyp(a)parallax.co.uk> writes:
> Hacking off RMS gains us nothing, if we can be sensitive to him
> without compromising XEmacs goals then I think we should do that. I
> suspect that the vast majority of users who read the faq will just
> think we are being anal and /or not care.
The users will be confused if Emacs is once used as a generic term,
and the other time to mean `FSF Emacs'. So let's please stick to
`Emacs' as generic. As the rationale in NEWS explains:
N.B. The term "GNU Emacs" refers to any release of Emacs Version
19 from the Free Software Foundation's GNU Project. (We do not
say just "Emacs" as Richard M. Stallman ["RMS"] prefers, because
it is clearly a more generic term.) The term "XEmacs" refers to
this program or to its predecessors "Era" and "Lucid Emacs". The
^^^ ERA
predecessor of all these program is called "Emacs 18".
When no
particular version is implied, "Emacs" will be used.
--
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
"Listen, kid, we're all in it together!" -- Harry Tuttle in _Brazil_
--
This message composed using voice recognition software and foot pedals.
(No keyboards were harmed while composing this message.)