Re: CONST ==> const - XEmacs-Beta - XEmacs Mailing List Archives

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

Re: CONST ==> const

Re: CONST ==> const

Relocating allocator on Linux

Neal D. Becker

Wednesday, 16 February 2000 Wed, 16 Feb '00

1:02 p.m.

(permalink)

Is this really a good idea? There's a really good reason that Jaime put in CONST, it's because const is broken in lots of environments (compilers+header files).

Reply

Show replies by date

Martin Buchholz

Wednesday, 16 February Wed, 16 Feb

1:09 p.m.

(permalink)

New subject: CONST ==> const

>>>> "n" == nbecker <nbecker(a)fred.net> writes:

n> Is this really a good idea? There's a really good reason that Jaime n> put in CONST, it's because const is broken in lots of environments n> (compilers+header files). The deed is done. Show me a broken system, and it'll be one that was already broken before the change. Jamie probably made that change around 1992, when ANSI C was only 3 years old. Martin

Reply

9041

days inactive

9041

days old

xemacs-beta@xemacs.org

Manage subscription

1 comments

2 participants

tags (0)

participants (2)

Martin Buchholz
Neal D. Becker