At 17:59 17/11/98 +0100, Jan Vroonhof wrote:
Andy Piper <andyp(a)parallax.co.uk> writes:
> Nope, that's not what I mean. Your list was not exhaustive, I was
> submitting a reason as to why this might be so (some patches are implicitly
> approved rather than explicitly - but they still go to xemacs-patches)
A my "outstanding" list which you quoted are bugs/problems where I
think there are currently NO patches at all, i.e. a showstopper list.
Ah, understand now.
andy
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
" .sigs are like your face - rarely seen by you and uglier than you think"
Dr Andy Piper, Technical Architect, Parallax Solutions Ltd
mail: andyp(a)parallax.co.uk web:
www.parallax.co.uk/~andyp