greg(a)alphatech.com (Greg Klanderman) writes: Yes. But this is still a major behavioral change which you should document. For instance, it may be worth noting (in the manual) that if you want `select-frame' to actually select the WM frame, you must bind focus-follows-mouse to nil. Other than the `C-x 5 o' problem, I must once again state that your patch does The Right Thing. For instance, (progn (select-frame (other-frame)) (insert "foo")) inserts "foo" in the other buffer's frame, which is correct, and then reselects this frame for focus. Kudos to you. :-) Good question. I think it should always and definitely change focus, as per documentation: C-x 5 o runs `other-frame' Documentation: Select the ARG'th different visible frame, and raise it. All frames are arranged in a cyclic order. This command selects the frame ARG steps away in that order. A negative ARG moves in the opposite order. -- Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr&gt; | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia --------------------------------+-------------------------------- * Q: What is an experienced Emacs user? * A: A person who wishes that the terminal had pedals.