"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
[corruption of files that accidentally look like ISO 2022]
This can be almost completely avoided by properly use of
`set-coding-priority-list'. However the default assumes that
you are reading text files and relatively aggressive decoding
is enabled.
Solving this should then be just a matter of site-wide configuration.
2) With European integration, the traditional Mule treatment of
the ISO-8859 family as disjoint character sets has become
untenable.
So *that's* the reason behind the multipart emails that alternate
between Latin-1 and Latin-9 even though all of the text could have
been represented in either character set. It appears that your
latin-unity package is meant to solve this problem; would calling
latin-unity-install in the site-wide configuration file be a
reasonable thing to do? On a quick scan, it doesn't hook into Gnus, so
that would also have to be done in the site configuration.
I think that for sites which use Latin-1, but would like to have
access to the Euro character (Latin-9) and may receive mails written
in other Latin character sets the advantages of Mule now far outweigh
the disadvantages.
In fact, the euro sign is not the only reason that moving to Latin-9
would be desirable for us. The official Finnish orthography requires
the use of s-caron and z-caron in some rare words, so theoretically
you cannot write Finnish correctly in Latin-1. Adoption of Latin-9 has
been slow, however, so we need to maintain backward compatibility by,
e.g., sending Latin-1 whenever the message can be represented in it.
Now latin-unity definitely seems to be worth trying.
--
Jouni K Seppänen