>>>> "SL" == SL Baur <steve(a)xemacs.org>
writes:
SL> Martin Buchholz <martin(a)xemacs.org> writes in xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org:
SL> ...
> Both me and Steve initially used a Happy Hacking keyboard here
in
> Japan. The irony of the whole Happy Hacking debate is that neither of
> us uses it on a daily basis any more. I'm using a Sun5 keyboard, and
> Steve is using some Japanese IBM PC keyboard with a more or less
> normal-looking key layout.
SL> `Normal'? `Normal'??? It's _not_ a normal keyboard for any canonical
SL> meaning of normal. The parens are shifted left to be above `8' and
SL> `9', `"' and `@' are on the wrong keys, the square and curly
braces
SL> are on the wrong keys. The key labeled `\' doesn't do anything. The
SL> key labeled `¥' generates `\', there is no `~' key, instead
there's
SL> an overline key that generates `~'. The space bar is tiny and crowded
SL> by huge Kanji, Hiragana, and Muhenkan keys. It's offset enough from
SL> where my thumb usually sits that I'm constantly mistyping it.
But even with all those cultural mods, the Backspace and Delete keys
are approximately in the same spot where the original IBM 101 keyboard
designers put them, which would tend to suggest that the acceptance of
this particular defacto standard is pretty high.
SL> I used to be a touch typist. Maybe I will be again some day ...
xmodmap is your friend.