Is anyone using gud? - XEmacs-Beta - XEmacs Mailing List Archives

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

Is anyone using gud?

(cdr (cdr (car ls))) vs (cddar ls)

Re: Macros: Scheme vs Common Lisp

SL Baur

Thursday, 27 August 1998 Thu, 27 Aug '98

6:32 a.m.

(permalink)

There's gdb.el/gdbsrc.el for GDB and the EOS stuff for DBX. Is anyone using gud? Is the XEmacs version usable?

Reply

Show replies by date

Rick Campbell

Thursday, 27 August Thu, 27 Aug

12:27 p.m.

(permalink)

I use it sometimes. It's pretty bad, but sometimes it's the only choice when dealing with SparcWorks C++. gdb-mode isn't practical because of name mangling issues, and painful as it is, I prefer running dbx through gud than any other interface I've tried. If there's a better way to run dbx in emacs -- especially if it looks a lot like gdb-mode, *please* let me know. Rick

Reply

Matthew O. Persico

Friday, 28 August Fri, 28 Aug

2:11 a.m.

(permalink)

I use it as a consequence of doing perldb in xemacs. -- #!/usr/bin/perl -- Matthew O. Persico print "Just Another Perl Neophyte\n"; ## Simplicity is a blessing when you're ## supporting the program at 2AM

Reply

9583

days inactive

9584

days old

xemacs-beta@xemacs.org

Manage subscription

2 comments

3 participants

tags (0)

participants (3)

Matthew O. Persico
Rick Campbell
SL Baur