10:06 a.m.
I am having problems getting Gnus fancy splitting to work as expected on
21.5. The problem is that messages frequently fail to match their expected
rules and end up in the catch all group.
Below is a sample of the splitting rules that I use:
(setq nnmail-split-methods 'nnmail-split-fancy
nnmail-split-fancy
'(|
("Subject" "NETGEAR Security Log" "mail.netgear_logs")
(: spam-split)
(from "xemacs-beta-.*(a)xemacs.org" "xemacs-beta")
(from "xemacs-design-.*(a)xemacs.org" "xemacs-design")
(from "xemacs-patches-.*(a)xemacs.org" "xemacs-patches")
(from "xemacs-review-.*(a)xemacs.org" "xemacs-review")
;; Unmatched mail goes to the catch all group.
"mail.misc"))
Mostly the messages end up in mail.misc but occasionally (in circumstances
that I'm yet to determine) messages are put in the right place.
This is with the latest CVS Gnus and XEmacs HEAD. The same Gnus installation
and configuration work as expected when using 21.4.17.
The problem remains when XEmacs is built with and without Mule, run on Mac OS
X or Fedora Core 3, with and without spam splitting and with when fancy
splitting nnmail or nnimap.
Has anyone else seen this problem?
Malcolm
--
Malcolm Purvis <malcolmp(a)xemacs.org>
12:47 p.m.
Malcolm Purvis <malcolmp(a)xemacs.org> writes:
I am having problems getting Gnus fancy splitting to work as expected
on
21.5. The problem is that messages frequently fail to match their expected
rules and end up in the catch all group.
Below is a sample of the splitting rules that I use:
(setq nnmail-split-methods 'nnmail-split-fancy
nnmail-split-fancy
'(|
("Subject" "NETGEAR Security Log" "mail.netgear_logs")
(: spam-split)
(from "xemacs-beta-.*(a)xemacs.org" "xemacs-beta")
(from "xemacs-design-.*(a)xemacs.org" "xemacs-design")
(from "xemacs-patches-.*(a)xemacs.org" "xemacs-patches")
(from "xemacs-review-.*(a)xemacs.org" "xemacs-review")
;; Unmatched mail goes to the catch all group.
"mail.misc"))
Mostly the messages end up in mail.misc but occasionally (in circumstances
that I'm yet to determine) messages are put in the right place.
Hmmh, why the explicit match for dash as in "-.*＠" ?
Ah, 'from being an abbrev for "from\\|sender\\|resent-from", the
Sender header would do the trick.
This is with the latest CVS Gnus and XEmacs HEAD. The same Gnus installation
and configuration work as expected when using 21.4.17.
Do your XEmacs installations use the exact same gnus installation?
Have you tried
B t runs the command gnus-summary-respool-trace
on a few samples yet?
That should provide the necessary clues.
Adrian
The problem remains when XEmacs is built with and without Mule, run on Mac OS
X or Fedora Core 3, with and without spam splitting and with when fancy
splitting nnmail or nnimap.
Has anyone else seen this problem?
Malcolm
--
Adrian Aichner
mailto:adrian＠xemacs.org
http://www.xemacs.org/
2:14 p.m.
>>>> "Adrian" == Adrian Aichner
<adrian(a)xemacs.org> writes:
Adrian> Do your XEmacs installations use the exact same gnus installation?
Yes, both versions pick up the same Gnus .elc files and the same packages (I
keep a separate directory for Gnus).
Adrian> Have you tried B t runs the command gnus-summary-respool-trace on a
Adrian> few samples yet?
OK, here are two. Firstly a message with the following subject line:
Subject: NETGEAR Security Log [4F:2E:E2]
21.4.17:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
("Subject" "NETGEAR Security Log" "mail.netgear_logs")
"mail.netgear_logs"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
21.5 HEAD:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(: spam-split)
"mail.misc"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Secondly, my original post on this topic, as it came back from the mailing
list:
21.4.17:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(: spam-split)
(from "xemacs-beta-.*(a)xemacs.org" "xemacs-beta")
"xemacs-beta"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
21.5 HEAD:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(: spam-split)
"mail.misc"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
In both cases, the 21.4.17 version is the expected behaviour.
Malcolm
--
Malcolm Purvis <malcolmp(a)xemacs.org>
5:57 p.m.
>>>> "Malcolm" == Malcolm Purvis
<malcolmp(a)xemacs.org> writes:
Malcolm> Mostly the messages end up in mail.misc but occasionally
Malcolm> (in circumstances that I'm yet to determine) messages are
Malcolm> put in the right place.
Have you tried finding the message files and searching for those
regexps?
Malcolm> This is with the latest CVS Gnus and XEmacs HEAD.
Maybe we should just move Gnus to tests/automated.
--
School of Systems and Information Engineering http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
ask what your business can "do for" free software.
2:32 p.m.
* Malcolm Purvis <malcolmp(a)xemacs.org> writes:
I am having problems getting Gnus fancy splitting to work as expected
on
21.5. The problem is that messages frequently fail to match their expected
rules and end up in the catch all group.
[...]
This is with the latest CVS Gnus and XEmacs HEAD. The same Gnus
installation
and configuration work as expected when using 21.4.17.
Malcolm, sorry for the delay, I missed seeing this thread (mind was
other places).
Yes, I have seen this before, or at least something very similar. Try
compiling Gnus with your 21.5, then it should DTRT for both 21.5 and
21.4.
I'll try to find the details in the ding archives of what is going
on. ATM, the only thing I can remember is that Katsumi Yamaoka
<yamaoka(a)jpl.org> knows about it. :-)
--
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: A94B3003>---|
| I am Dyslexic of Borg. |
| Fusistance is retile. Your arse will be laminated. |
|------------------------------------<steve(a)sxemacs.org>---|
4:17 p.m.
* Steve Youngs <steve(a)sxemacs.org> writes:
* Malcolm Purvis <malcolmp(a)xemacs.org> writes:
> I am having problems getting Gnus fancy splitting to work as
expected on
> 21.5.
Yes, I have seen this before, or at least something very similar.
Try
compiling Gnus with your 21.5, then it should DTRT for both 21.5 and
21.4.
I'll try to find the details in the ding archives of what is
going
on. ATM, the only thing I can remember is that Katsumi Yamaoka
<yamaoka(a)jpl.org> knows about it. :-)
Malcolm, start here...
http://list-archive.xemacs.org/xemacs-beta/200403/msg00010.html
--
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: A94B3003>---|
| I am Dyslexic of Borg. |
| Fusistance is retile. Your arse will be laminated. |
|------------------------------------<steve(a)sxemacs.org>---|
7:21 p.m.
New subject: syntax table behavior in XEmacs 21.4 and 21.5 (was: XEmacs 21.5 and Gnus fancy splitting.)
On Mon, Oct 03 2005, Steve Youngs wrote:
* Steve Youngs <steve(a)sxemacs.org> writes:
* Malcolm Purvis <malcolmp(a)xemacs.org> writes:
> Yes, I have seen this before, or at least something very similar. Try
> compiling Gnus with your 21.5, then it should DTRT for both 21.5 and
> 21.4.
> I'll try to find the details in the ding archives of what is going
> on. ATM, the only thing I can remember is that Katsumi Yamaoka
> <yamaoka(a)jpl.org> knows about it. :-)
Malcolm, start here...
http://list-archive.xemacs.org/xemacs-beta/200403/msg00010.html
[ Or:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/56459
And an earlier report by Wes Hardaker
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/56414 ]
Katsumi Yamaoka provided this test case:
$ cat _xemacs_syntax_table_.el
(message "`%s'"
(with-temp-buffer
(require 'mml)
(insert "disposition=attachment")
(goto-char (point-min))
(with-syntax-table mml-syntax-table
(forward-sexp 1)
(buffer-substring (point) (point-max)))))
XEmacs 21.4.15 "Security Through Obscurity"
$ xemacs -batch -q -no-site-file -l _xemacs_syntax_table_.el -kill
`'
With XEmacs 21.5-b18 "chestnut":
$ xemacs -batch -q -no-site-file -l _xemacs_syntax_table_.el -kill
`=attachment'
Bye, Reiner.
--
,,,
(o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/
1:29 p.m.
>>>> "Steve" == Steve Youngs
<steve(a)sxemacs.org> writes:
Steve> Yes, I have seen this before, or at least something very similar. Try
Steve> compiling Gnus with your 21.5, then it should DTRT for both 21.5 and
Steve> 21.4.
Compiling Gnus with 21.5 did fix the problem.
Thanks,
Malcolm
--
Malcolm Purvis <malcolmp(a)xemacs.org>
7334
days inactive
7339
days old
7 comments
5 participants
participants (5)
-
Adrian Aichner -
Malcolm Purvis -
Reiner Steib -
Stephen J. Turnbull -
Steve Youngs