sb> Michael Sperber <sperber(a)informatik.uni-tuebingen.de&gt; writes: sb> No. The current behavior of having packages override the core lisp is sb> the correct one, I believe. If you need core lisp in front packages, sb> can't you use the very-late-package technique used to run with sb> packages from previous XEmacs versions? Since the auto-autoloads compilation problems seems fixed in b37-pre1, I concur. (One less patch to cook up ... :-} ) If you've got shadowings between packages and core Lisp, there's a high chance you're screwed either way. -- Cheers =8-} Chipsy Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla