At 14:27 17/11/98 +0100, Jan Vroonhof wrote:
Andy Piper <andyp(a)parallax.co.uk> writes:
> There are more than this. Patches have been submitted by the review board
> which don't need approval.
You mean that there are patches that never appeared on xemacs-patches?
Nope, that's not what I mean. Your list was not exhaustive, I was
submitting a reason as to why this might be so (some patches are implicitly
approved rather than explicitly - but they still go to xemacs-patches)
andy
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
" .sigs are like your face - rarely seen by you and uglier than you think"
Dr Andy Piper, Technical Architect, Parallax Solutions Ltd
mail: andyp(a)parallax.co.uk web:
www.parallax.co.uk/~andyp