Charles G Waldman <cgw(a)fnal.gov> writes:
Christophe Prud'homme writes:
> I just recompiled gtk-xemacs and I must say Woo!
<AOL> Me too! Woo! Woo! </AOL>
> in gtk/xemacs pages, qt is mentioned, will there be any port to this other
> toolkit?
Maybe if you're willing to pay William Perry $15,000 to do it... ;-)
Hehehehehe... Qt was definitely an option, and would have been less work,
but several factors ruled it out. See my followup to christophe for more
details.
-bp