Ville Skyttä writes: I suspect make distclean is not good enough; you probably need to sand the bits off the metal and check out again. That must be leakage from my workspace, my bad. It should be harmless (since there will be no definition for PACKAGE_FUTURE a reference will turn into the empty string), but I should fix it, probably by committing the package-future stuff. Then you won't need to patch lisp/autoloads.el. (And package-future automatically turns itself off if you do patch lisp/autoloads.el.) _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta

Ville Skyttä writes: I'm sorry, it was late and I was too tired to say more. This semantic-related stuff is too clever for its own good -- I really wish those guys would work up a patch to Emacs rather than hacking up a non-standard environment -- and bootstrapping it is very delicate. I had a lot of trouble getting it to build in an existing tree built with older 21.5. make clean (and even make distclean) was leaving some state somewhere, which I didn't have time to track down before things started working again. (It might have been my own hacks.) However, in my experience so far, both a 21.5 HEAD build and package-future.el are able to do it in a new tree. _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta