Hello XEmacs beta testers. I am in the process of building
XEmacs-21.1.6 for distribution. I have tested the attached
configuration. Have a great day!
Sincerely,
The XEmacs Build 'Bot (revision 2)
--
uname -a: Linux mithril 2.2.11 #1 SMP Thu Aug 12 00:21:53 EDT 1999 i686 unknown
./configure '--prefix=/home/acs/cvsroot' '--cflags=-O'
'--with-mule' '--without-x11' '--debug=no'
'--error-checking=none'
XEmacs 21.1.6 "Big Bend" configured for `i686-pc-linux'.
Where should the build process find the source code? /home/acs/cvsroot/xemacs-21.1
What installation prefix should install use? /home/acs/cvsroot
What operating system and machine description files should XEmacs use?
`s/linux.h' and `m/intel386.h'
What compiler should XEmacs be built with? gcc -O
Should XEmacs use the GNU version of malloc? yes
(Using Doug Lea's new malloc from the GNU C Library.)
Should XEmacs use the relocating allocator for buffers? yes
What window system should XEmacs use? none
Compiling in native sound support.
Compiling in support for Berkeley DB.
Compiling in support for GNU DBM.
Compiling in support for ncurses.
Compiling in support for GPM (General Purpose Mouse).
Compiling in Mule (multi-lingual) support.
Compiling in DLL support.
movemail will use "dot-locking" for locking mail spool files.
Using Lisp_Objects with minimal tagbits.
Show replies by date
Again, I have a question about the XEmacs 21.1 and the latest
mule-base package.
mule-base 1.32 contains changes that cause problems under XEmacs
21.1. Even though this package appears under /pub/xemacs/packages
directory, it is not for the latest version of XEmacs 21.1.
Several users asked me why XEmacs 21.1 with mule-base 1.32
complains max-lisp-eval-depth or something. Of course mule-base 1.31
is O.K.
Is someone thinking of updating 21.1 for mule-base 1.32 ? If not,
please upload the mule-base that is good for XEmacs 21.1.
Thanks.
--
Tsukamoto, Tetsuo