Jan Vroonhof wrote:
No, but I think they are more or less orthogonal. I am all for
make concentrated push on the essentials, but you cannot simply trade
projects for another when the only time available is volunteer time.
This argument is a fallacy, because new and buggy features waste the time
of lots of people other than the feature author (e.g. the maintainer), who
have to deal with bug reports, patches, etc. Just look at the wastage due
to the Xaw3d mess.
Even though I know one of the most useful contributions right now
XEmacs would be to work a complete weekend with the FSF and XEmacs
User manuals in an Ediff session, I still want to worry why using
an XEmacs's external window in an XEmacs subwindow doesn't work.
<fatalist>
If the purpose is to attract more users, high priority should given to
implement transpart background support
explain?
ben
--
In order to save my hands, I am cutting back on my responses, especially
to XEmacs-related mail. You _will_ get a response, but please be patient.
If you need an immediate response and it is not apparent in your message,
please say so. Thanks for your understanding.