Simon Josefsson <jas(a)pdc.kth.se> writes:
Hi, is this discrepency between Emacs and XEmacs date routines a
feature? I'm not sure what limits on the elisp time structure is so
the result of passing year 1904 to `encode-time' is perhaps undefined.
Both Emacsen basically use the same time representation: Standard Unix
seconds since 1/1/1970. FSF Emacs allows a negative number of seconds.
XEmacs just a positive number. I am not sure whether that is
intentional or just an oversight.
Jan