Re: `beginning-of-defun-function' patch
- First Post
- Replies
- Stats
-
Go to
- ----- 2024 -----
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2023 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2022 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2021 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2020 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2019 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2018 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2017 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2016 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2015 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2014 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2013 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2012 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2011 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2010 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2009 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2008 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2007 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2006 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2005 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2004 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2003 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2002 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2001 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 2000 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 1999 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
- February
- January
- ----- 1998 -----
- December
- November
- October
- September
- August
- July
- June
- May
- April
- March
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Andreas Roehler writes:
> AFAIS functionality has been introduced in GNU Emacs with
> revision 1.35, Wed Jan 5 15:08:36 2000 UTC with
OK, that's good enough.
> Even if it's not written with dolist that time, we shouldn't have any
> problems with v3 from this. Its just a snippet.
That's not the way this works, since we are interested in many
"contributions" of copyright material from this "contributor" (ie,
GPLv3 GNU Emacs). If we accumulate snippets, they will add up quickly
to a license violation.
Schnauf.
> Should you still being concerned, I may replace the dolist by a
> while....
There are three options:
(1) dig up the GPLv2 code yourself and make sure (quick and best)
Done.
The code I'm relying upon was already present with
Revision 1.77 -
Sun Dec 17 22:56:39 2006 UTC (23 months, 3 weeks ago) by cyd
Branch: MAIN
CVS Tags: EMACS_PRETEST_22_0_92
Changes since 1.76: +61 -42 lines
Diff to previous 1.76
(beginning-of-defun-raw): Optimise (for speed) the case when
open-paren-in-column-0-is-defun-start is nil. Based on code by Martin
Rudalics.
its GPLv2.
In mean, you can check in the patch safely.
Cheers
Andreas Röhler
(2) replace the dolist with a while and a comment that this needs
syncing when XEmacs moves to GPLv3 (quick but makes future work)
(3) wait for me to dig up the GPLv2 code and decide what to do (if the
GPLv2 code is substantially the same as yours then obviously it
goes in)
I apologize for this trouble which is my (and to a minor extent the
rest of the Board's) fault. I will up my priority on getting the
GPLv3 conversion done, but in the meantime we should play this
according to RMS's rules (which, after all, are just careful
conformance to the law).
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta
5828
days inactive
5828
days old
0 comments
1 participants
tags (0)
participants (1)
-
Andreas Röhler