>>>> "dv" == Didier Verna
<verna(a)inf.enst.fr> writes: 
dv> sperber(a)informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]) writes:
Hrvoje> (literally). I don't know why it's still labeled beta. Steve, bug or
Hrvoje> feature?
> 
> Bug, I'd say.
> 
> >> - AFAIK, there has been no official 21.0 announcement
>  
Hrvoje> It was on xemacs-announce.
> 
> There has been no announcement on comp.emacs.xemacs, and the web page
> still says 20.4.
> 
> All the discussion about binary kits and the 21.0 release has raised
> far more questions than provided answers.  What *is* the release
> strategy for the future?  What status will 21.0 have?  How will we
> deal with binary kits.  I'm sure you guys thought up something in
> Japan, but it sure hasn't hit xemacs-beta yet. 
dv>         The japan release was supposed to be 21.0.
More questions.  What's a "japan release"?  What does this whole
sentence mean?  It would be great if someone who was there could type
up some rough minutes of what happened there.
dv> For some reason, it was still labeled "beta". So I suggested to
dv> Steve that we should wait for the first patchlevel[1] release
What's a "patchlevel release"?  Are we talking about 21.1.x?  Is this
related to the 19.15 patchlevels in process?
-- 
Cheers =8-} Chipsy
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla