>>>> "William" == William M Perry
<wmperry(a)gnu.org> writes:
William> rendhalver(a)xemacs.org (Rendhalver [Peter Brown]) writes:
>>
>>>> "William" ==
William M Perry <wmperry(a)gnu.org> writes:
>>
William> Valdis.Kletnieks(a)vt.edu writes:
> >> Hmm... anybody want to play? ;)
>
> :)
>
William> There will be a lot of work to get the GTK stuff to work
William> with GTK 2.x. The lisp bindings will need to change pretty
William> drastically because of the new glib stuff, and a big
William> redesign of the object system.
>
> there are a whole bunch of docs and api specs on
http://developer.gnome.org/
>
> i am currently running gnome2 so i will be available for a guinea pig :)
William> Heh - I didn't say _I_ have the time to do it. :) I've been
travelling all
William> summer, and am just now getting back into the swing of things. The new
William> glib and reworked object system should really make things easier for the
William> lisp bindings, but I'm not sure if that is the right way to go or
just
William> break down and do the widget stuff in raw C. The lisp bindings are cool,
yeah tricky decision i guess
any ideas wether rep-gtk could be used ??
William> but unless Gtk gets so #%!@#!ing spiffy that we drop support for other
William> window systems (not likely), I don't see a lot of people adopting gtk
lisp
William> programs for core XEmacs functionality.
i cant see other widget sets being droped either
William> Is anybody actually -running- gtk2 for useful things? I've found that
99%
William> of the apps out there are still strictly gtk1.
i have all of gnome 2 that is in the FreeBSD ports tree
they are pretty much all gtk 2 i believe
i only have one gtk 1.2 app still installed and thats cause i havent
checked to see if xmms is being ported to gtk2
--
XEmacs Advocate | Do not try the patience of Wizards,
FreeBSD Devote | for they are subtle and quick to anger.
Perl Hacker | - Elric (Technomage) , Babylon 5.
Apache God | <mailto:rendhalver at xemacs.org> <GnuPG KeyID: AE51D190>