Charles G Waldman <cgw(a)pgt.com> writes in xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org:
If we're going to supply an IRC client for XEmacs, I think
"irchat"
might be a better choice. Irchat gives you a split window for commands
and the channel dialog, it has keybindings for common actions; I think
I like it better than "zenirc" (just my opinion). I need to play with
Zenirc a little more, maybe I'm missing something...
Well, if I'm going to waste time fiddling with IRC, I might as well
*really* waste time. I upload an irchat package for comparison:
(irchat
(standards-version 1.0
version "1.00"
author-version "980625-2"
date "oc
key "
build-date "1998-08-16"
maintainer "XEmacs Development Team <xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org>"
distribution stable
priority medium
category "comm"
dump nil
description "ZENIRC IRC Client."
filename "irchat-1.00-pkg.tar.gz"
md5sum "fe58080b11e11315aa8116daf9f52658"
size 212739
provides (irchat)
requires ()
type regular
))
This is a snapshot, and it's rough.
...
If we're going to start an IRC channel we ought to do
it on the Undernet - for instance, this is where the good #linux
channel is; the EFnet #linux channel tends to be a zoo.
Undernet servers all have geographically descriptive hostnames like
"phoenix.az.us.undernet.org", it's pretty easy to find one near you.
Right now, I'm holding onto the operator privileges for the Undernet
#xemacs channel, maybe I'll see some of you there.
Of the two, I think I like zenirc better, but I am a total IRC
novice. There's no reason not to include both.