New subject: Dynamically deriving major mode from prog-mode or fundamental-mode

Friday, 22 March 2013

        Brian Palmer <bpalmer(a)gmail.com&gt; writes:

...
 This is perhaps suboptimal, but perhaps
 (if (not (fboundp 'prog-mode))
    (define-derived-mode prog-mode fundamental-mode ...))

 and then always derive go-mode from prog-mode ? 
Would the body of that mode be empty or would I have to set some
variables?

...

 (It probably makes sense to have prog-mode added to xemacs, too, no? Even
 if just as a place-holder).

Adding it to XEmacs would probably be the best idea (from my
perspective, anyway). Most programming modes for GNU Emacs will be
deriving from prog-mode, so having it in XEmacs, too, would make keeping
them synchronized easier.

_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

Re: Dynamically deriving major mode from prog-mode or fundamental-mode