Re: BBDB sees bad lisp?

Good news and bad news ... mostly bad. ee> I concur. (It happened in Gnus, too.) ee> I saw this, too; but BBDB-2.34 seems to have ee> fixed it. The good news. As for the bad news: ee> (BBDB-2.34 has another bug, though, which leads ee> to void-function errors doing a ee> bbdb/*-show-sender and so on; the fix is easy; on ee> line 56 of bbdb-com.el, add an ee> `eval-and-compile'.) Ummm ... line 56 of bbdb-com.el in the version 2.34 bundle starts with: (if (featurep 'xemacs) (progn (fset 'bbdb-extent-string 'extent-string) ... blah blah blah ... I wrapped that entire form, starting from before the if, in (eval-and-compile (if ... blah blah)) ... was that the right thing to do? In any case, having done that and re-byte-compiled the file, I find that BBDB's behavior is more screwed up than it was in 2.32, which is what I was using before. In fact, it's barfing on so many addresses it's barely useable. Decided I'd better revert to the earlier version, but was frustrated to find: o Tools => Packages => List and install tells me that the latest officially sanctioned by XEmacs is 1.17. Didn't know that. Evidently I downloaded a new version (i.e., 2.32) from SourceForge or wherever some long time ago. It was mostly working, so that's the version I want to go back to. o I went to look for it on SourceForge, and can only find a download bundle for 2.34. Does anyone know how I get back to where I was before? Grrr. If someone can point me to a tar.gz bundle of 2.32 I can take it from there. (Or email me one as an attachment, I don't mine.) So much for *that* bright idea. -- Lynn David Newton Phoenix, AZ