Re: [PATCH] Time to consider pending-del default
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005, Aidan Kehoe stipulated:
Ar an triú lá de mà Feabhra, scrÃobh Nix:
> In fact, it seems easy enough to me to have a `defaults.el' package that
> keeps track of these things, so that an expert user who doesn't want any
> changing defaults to disturb him (like most of us) could say
>
> (defaults-as-at "2005-01-20")
I think thatâs an excellent idea.
OK, I'll have a hack. It shouldn't be hard; the only vaguely nonportable
bit is to set the `standard-value' property if it's already set, so that
customize doesn't think the value has been changed from its
default.
The advantage of requiring the dates to be in that form is that I don't
need to bother parsing them at all, I can just lexicographically sort :)
If anyone would prefer RFC822 dates, please say; but since we're using
ISO standard dates in the ChangeLog, I think we should use them here
as well.
Dates only for now, no times: so don't change the default for a single
variable more than once per day if you're going to release more than
once on that day as well ;)
> [...] (I'd say that the poor choice of defaults is
undoubtedly XEmacs's
> largest problem...)
My subjective judgement is that itâs a big deal, too. Though âlargest
problemâ is perhaps overstating it.
Hyperbole, sorry. Here, let me fix it:
s/undoubtedly/doubtedly/:)
--
`Blish is clearly in love with language. Unfortunately,
language dislikes him intensely.' --- Russ Allbery