>>>> "st" == Stephen J Turnbull
>>>> "Re: Bug push - we need a bug tracking system."
>>>> Wed, 05 Oct 2005 19:04:07 +0900
st> Here are *my* desiderata. This does not represent a consensus
st> of the board.
st> (1) It needs to accept submissions, additions, and
st> status-changing commands by email.
st> (2) Ditto for the web interface.
st> (3) It needs to have a nice web presentation. (they all do,
st> so that's not a problem, but there are better and worse an
st> that's a consideration.
st> (4) It needs to ping watchers on (a) new submissions to the
st> issue or
st> (b) status changes (at the watcher's option).
st> (5) It needs to have ways of customizing the presentation,
st> adding new types of issues, merging and splitting issues,
st> etc.
st> (6) It should be hackable by me and/or somebody with a long
st> reliable association with the XEmacs project.
st> (7) It needs to have a certain level of security.
debbugs (2.4.1)
The bug tracking system based on the active Debian BTS
<
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/misc/debbugs>
Certainly has 1-4b. The remaining seem somewhat subjective. :)
Start looking at <
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/>.
There is (X)Emacs assisted bug reporting (debian.el).
Two questions come to mind for which I have no answers at hand: can
the Debian BTS notion of packages be easily adapted to XEmacs packages
and how hard would it be to rip out unwanted Debianisms? A lot might
be gained from the tried and true developer disciplines that are
supported.
jam