Re: To ChangeLog or not to ChangeLog, that is the question
>>>> "Lars" == Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
<larsi(a)gnus.org> writes:
Lars> Martin Buchholz <martin(a)xemacs.org> writes:
> My feeling is that ChangeLogs are a good thing, for MOST BUT NOT
ALL
> changes, and that contributions should not be categorically turned
> down due to lack of ChangeLogs. I think this is just Common Sense.
Lars> I think ChangeLog entries are nice to have, and all changes that are
Lars> user-visible should have ChangeLog entries. (That is -- all code
Lars> changes should have entries; changes to indentation, comments (etc.)
Lars> shouldn't necessarily have.)
Lars> What I've started doing lately with Gnus patches that I get is
Lars> including a standard response at the end of the aqc of patches that
Lars> are ChangeLog-less saying something like "In the future, could you
Lars> include ChangeLog entries?", and then I write the ChangeLog entries
Lars> myself.
Let's adopt Lars' ChangeLog policy for use with XEmacs.
Martin