>>>> "mb" == Martin Buchholz
<martin(a)xemacs.org> writes:
mb> Actually, I think that might be moving in the wrong direction.
mb> I don't like how mule is singled out for being odd, for
But it _is_ odd. _The Lisp reader in a non-Mule xemacs will barf on
some Mule constructs._ Lisp doesn't have #ifdef to turn those into
uninterpreted bytes if your xemacs is non-Mule.
This change can be interpreted as making the treatment of Mule
consistent between core and packages.
mb> examples in makefiles. I'd like to have no special treatment
mb> for mule files.
Do something about it then. It's only a matter of getting rid of
no-mule XEmacs, that should be simple enough, right? Not.
--
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091
_________________ _________________ _________________ _________________
What are those straight lines for? "XEmacs rules."