Re: [PATCH] gutter-items.el -- another patch
Is there such a thing as a line-item veto? The patch did several
things, at least one of which -- fixing a bug in the documentation --
is ridiculous to veto. If someone would actually respond to the
issues I raised in my original message, I can submit a patch fixing
which ever issues people agree should be fixed. I don't think I'll
bother unless I get feedback, because I don't want to put any work
into it if it might get vetoed again.
"Andy Piper" <andy(a)xemacs.org> writes:
VETO.
Changing the default seems somewhat subjective to me and I believe the
current default is more useful.
Obsoleteness should be done using make-obsolete-variable I think.
andy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xemacs-patches-admin(a)xemacs.org
> [mailto:xemacs-patches-admin＠xemacs.org]On Behalf Of John H Palmieri
> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 11:54 AM
> To: xemacs-patches(a)xemacs.org
> Subject: [PATCH] gutter-items.el -- another patch
>
>
> I'm attaching a patch to fix the problems I outlined in the message
> below. (The message was sent to the xemacs-beta list, but got no
> response, so I'm proceeding with the patch.)
>
>
--
J. H. Palmieri
Dept of Mathematics, Box 354350 mailto:palmieri＠math.washington.edu
University of Washington http://www.math.washington.edu/~palmieri/
Seattle, WA 98195-4350