Re: Kids, Don't Try This At Home Fix: Building oort Gnus in site-packages

Ville> ...and I think of it pretty much as the opposite :). Ville> Anyway, it obviously can be used for both of purposes. OK. Ville> I'm fine with changing this, just go ahead if it bugs Ville> you. unsupported-packages? Actually, I was thinking in terms of xemacs-packages. Most of the stuff in unsupported ends up being moved to xemacs-packages. For stuff that we probably never will support, I prefer the name "contrib". That's not important. However, we badly need an uninstall target in XEmacs.rules. For Unix, finding the MANIFEST.$package and doing `cat MANIFEST.$package | xargs rm -f' works, I bet. Dunno about Windows though. Ville> But strictly speaking, IMHO we're not distributing anything Ville> under unsupported/. It's stuff that just lives in our CVS, CVS is one of our primary modes of distribution now. We're a free software project; to me that implies we distribute everything we do, perhaps with some evaluation as to whether you really want to take it or not. :-) Ville> Hey, where's my "Boot XEmacs" CD... :) chsh -s /usr/bin/xemacs comes pretty close. (This used to work, have tried it recently though.) -- Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN My nostalgia for Icon makes me forget about any of the bad things. I don't have much nostalgia for Perl, so its faults I remember. Scott Gilbert c.l.py