Re: New package: flim 1.14.4
On Thu, 2002-08-01 at 13:46, Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> Of course, I have barely tried the package so it needs
reviewing.
>
> Yep. And the dependency of APEL worries me too, given the recent
> troubles and the somewhat uncertain future of it as a xemacs package.
On second thought it might make sense to extract the SASL parts of
FLIM into a separate library -- that's the part I really was
interested in. Then the gnus, sieve, mail-lib and possibly others can
require the sasl package. Which does not depend on APEL. What do you
think?
Sounds good. Of course, this means that we're a bit more on our own
regarding upstream support and communication. Maybe this should be
discussed with the authors, if they'd be willing to split the SASL stuff
out of the FLIM package?
--
\/ille Skyttä
ville.skytta at xemacs.org