Re: xemacs vs emacs
David Kastrup writes:
Just what I said: Apple IP does not play into it at all. You are
confusing this with Apple mindshare: GNU software, at least GNU Emacs,
does not strive to implement features
Um, no. According to Stefan and Richard, GNU Emacs refuses to accept
such features even if the author is happy to contribute them.
that enhance Emacs only on proprietary platforms.
What is so hard to understand about "IP == proprietary"?
The current MacOSX-only behavior of Aquamacs is dividing Emacs users
instead of giving them the relief of unification.
Well, yes, indeed. That's why they[1] call it a "fork".
Footnotes:
[1] Eg, Dan Nicolaescu, same thread.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta