Re: Unified file-name syntax?
David Kastrup <dak(a)gnu.org> writes:
Uh Michael? As long as you are the only person responsible for
copyrightable changes after tramp got relicensed, you can contribute
whatever you want under the previous license.
I still ask Kai for such changes, just for the records.
If few others have contributed (and done this under a working
copyright
assignment to the FSF), you need to ask them. They are free to permit
you redistribution under the old terms, too.
Yes, but I'm short in time. I do not want to distribute the same sources
twice under different license terms.
I also believe that Tramp 2.1 shall be the version in the XEmacs package
repository. Tramp 2.0 is said to see security updates only (although I
break this rule again and again :-) And Tramp 2.1 does not exist in a
GPLv2 version I'ld like to maintain.
It is a different question, however, whether it makes sense at all
for
some project to go to all this hassle when XEmacs is likely going to
move to GPLv3 eventually, anyway.
It looks promising now.
Best regards, Michael.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta