Re: Better Installataion file and `describe-installation' under Windows
Adrian Aichner wrote:
[snip]
>> +Installation.el: Installation
>> + ＠type > Installation.el <<
>> +(setq Installation-string
>> + (replace-in-string
>> + "
>> +<<NOKEEP
>> + type Installation >> Installation.el
>> + type >> Installation.el <<
>> +"
>> + "" ""))
Should be "" ""))
What did I do wrong? After patching xemacs.mak on Windows 95, do you
still have the C-m above?
No. The ^M got thrown away by the time your patch got to me. Do you see
the ^M in your patch as it appeared in xemacs-patches? Maybe my mail
client or server discarded the ^M but if not perhaps you should resubmit
with the patch as a binary attachment instead of as inline text. And
lets hope that the cvs server doesn't decide to do something funky with
it too.
Putting the ^M back makes your patch work for me on non-MULE.
Jonathan.
--
Jonathan Harris | jhar(a)tardis.ed.ac.uk
London, England | Jonathan.Harris(a)symbian.com