Michael Sperber writes:
> hg commit -m "changed <file1> ..." # look
Ma, no push yet!
> # it may *not* be OK to push here:
> # that means that people who do
> # "hg onsub pull -u; hg commit"
> # will pollute .hgsubstate!
There's no problem pushing here. It's just that what gets pushed here
doesn't get pulled automatically by a top-level "hg update", unless a
commit in the top level gets pushed.
I agree with what you wrote as far as it goes. But is that really
responsive to my comment? (N.B. in the comment, "people" should
actually read "other people".)
> cd ../..
> hg commit -m "publish sources of <pkg>" xemacs-packages/<pkg>
> # updates .hgsubstate
> hg push # recursively pushes
That's correct, but to my mind is what Norbert should do.
OK, but in that case the committer in <pkg> needs to do a push in
<pkg> after committing above.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta