Re: Some questions about wrapping types
Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson writes:
And on that note, why is that the internal putprop callback is
supposed to return 0 to throw a lisp error, but the remprop callback
is supposed to return -1? Wouldn't it have been better to synchronize
it? (This is from Fput and Fremprop in fns.c).
All types, not just types in modules, use these conventions. I don't
think it's worth changing at this late date.
I also just checked, and afaict, this has not changed in 21.5.
Given how few modules are actually out there (mine may be the only
one who does types) do you want to change it?
What do you mean by "type"? As I use the word, every lrecord/lcrecord
is a different type. Most modules do create specialized lrecords, and
aside from those there are currently over 100 different ones in the
enum of lrecord_types in core.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta