"Stephen J. Turnbull" <turnbull(a)sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> writes:
1. We would probably want to add the ansi-colors Custom group to
relevant XEmacs-specific groups (in particular, package system
related groups). This would best be done in ansi-colors.el
itself, probably conditional on (featurep 'xemacs). Any
problem with that?
No problem. Just tell me what you need. If at all possible,
it will be in the same places for Emacs.
2. Does it make sense to add the finder keywords
"terminals"
and/or "services"?
terminals support for terminal types
services provides services for use by other programs (cf `user')
Sure, I'll do that.
3. If you wanted to, you could support this as a
"regular" XEmacs
package. Then it would be listed explicitly in the
list-packages interface, browsable by users unfamiliar with
it.
I prefer not to do this, as I use XEmacs only occasionally... :)
4. If not, normally people who maintain XEmacs packages or parts
of them are granted access to the relevant package on
request. If you wanted to, you could almost treat the XEmacs
anonymous CVS server as the primary mirror of your primary
repository, as in 3.
I prefer not to use CVS, since I have internet access from work, and at
work we have a Windows environment.
The default option is "you contribute, we synch when we
feel
like it, nobody cries if the code diverges."
Cool. :)
Alex.