On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Jerry James <james(a)xemacs.org> wrote:
Hmmmm.... I did a fresh CVS checkout. Comparing the two packages
trees shows that I have Local.rules, macro.list, and macro.suppress in
my original tree, but not in the new tree. That's normal. I also
have xemacs-packages/eshell/esh-groups.el in the old tree, but not the
new tree. Is that a generated file? If so, "make extraclean" should
remove it. Anyway, that's it. There are no other differences. I'll
try building again today and see if it was a gremlin.
I compiled XEmacs from a Mercurial repository that I pulled this
morning. I threw away my old packages tree and did a fresh CVS
checkout. I'm still getting the same build failure.
Do I need to set XEMACS_21_5 in Local.rules? Except for adding a
bzip2 path, my Local.rules is identical to Local.rules.template. I
have verified that the XEmacs I just built is the one being invoked by
the package build process.
--
Jerry James
http://loganjerry.googlepages.com/
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta