Re: 2007-04-27 sumo is missing MANIFEST.erc

ST> I really don't like the idea of requiring people to upgrade when ST> we've promised that the packages will support 21.4. But what does "support" mean here? I agree that we shouldn't require an upgrade of 21.4 before a user can install and run new packages. On the other hand, I don't see a big problem telling package maintainers and anyone else who builds from CVS that they'll need to upgrade their installation of 21.4. One thing I'm unclear on: does the problem affect users' ability to recompile individual files or packages (e.g., M-x byte-recompile-directory), or does it just affect people who build from CVS? cheers, mike _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta