Re: Patch: Promoting characters to 31 bits (for discussion)
On 2 Jul 1999, SL Baur wrote:
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> writes in
xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org:
...
> Note that no editor on 32-bit systems can grok a >2G buffer because of
> limited pointer size. Thus a 1G limit is just one step below the
> "theoretical" limit. You can argue that being two steps below it is
> not much worse, but I am not really convinced.
O.K. Since size matters to you, how about another alternative? What
would/could we gain or lose by using long long as EMACS_INTs on 32 bit
architectures?
Is `long long' ANSI? Further, is it guaranteed that sizeof(long long) >
sizeof(long)?
-Justin
vallon(a)mindspring.com