Re: xemacs vs emacs
David Kastrup writes:
I don't get your point. Windows is not free software either and
Emacs
runs on it just fine.
David Reitter explains it here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2008-03/msg00785.html
and Stefan Monnier confirmed that David's reasoning conforms to Emacs
policy in a private conversation later.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta