Re: [PATCH] Abstract out a display-table-specific API (2)
On Wed, Jan 02 2008, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Reiner Steib writes:
> "Emacs Gnus" (= Gnus in the Emacs trunk) is the same as "larsi
Gnus"
> (Gnus trunk from cvs.gnus.org), only some files (general purpose libs
> not depending on Gnus) have been moved from emacs/lisp/gnus to other
> places.
I seem to recall Richard suggesting moving some functions from one
file to another. Is my memory incorrect?
I don't recall that any functions were moved (but I might be wrong).
Even if this time the functions weren't moved, didn't he
leave the
possibility open for future cases?
Yes, but these moves would most probably be synched to Gnus CVS as
well.
> Miles Bader maintains an arch repository of Gnus (and Emacs)
[...]
I'm aware of that. However, as logical as the UI of Arch sounds when
Tom Lord explains it, it doesn't work out that way in practice. Since
Mike K already knows and likes Mercurial, that will work for us. I
don't really see a big advantage to moving to a Arch-to-Mercurial
workflow either.
I just wanted to mention that it exists.
Bye, Reiner.
--
,,,
(o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta