Re: smtpmail and delete-process fails

Raymond Toy writes: If I say it's just event-driven (callback-based) code, does that help? The point is that the sentinel receives all events, and it receives them concurrently -- you can't know what state the server is in when the sentinel is activated. I don't know if the process ever emits events other than "stop" (or whatever it's called), but if it does it presumably could do so "simultaneously" with the QUIT message. Yes, please. After some more experience maybe we will decide that the killing the process and buffer is always the right thing to do (actually, I think in the long run that's quite likely), but precisely because this is concurrent code, it's likely that if there is a bug, it will be intermittent. It would be nice if we could get at the *first* process and buffer where it happens. :-) Steve _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta