Re: bury-buffer but no unbury-buffer
Whats about collecting all the different implementations, merging them
and building a package?
I think the idea is nice.
MfG
Oliver
Krishnakumar B wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 June 2003, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>>>>>>"Kai" == Kai Großjohann <kai.grossjohann(a)gmx.net>
writes:
>
> Kai> kai.grossjohann(a)gmx.net (Kai Großjohann) writes:
>
> >> Do you have C-x <left> and C-x <right>? Not sure when they
> >> were added.
>
> Kai> Gnah. You have XEmacs. *blush*
>
>So? If XEmacs doesn't have it, we'll just consider that a request for
>enhancement. What do they do?
What is wrong with the stuff in sample.el written by Ben ? It even cycles
buffers based on major mode. Saves soem cycles when cycling through
buffers....
-kitty.