Mats Lidell writes:
>>>>> Stephen J Turnbull <stephen(a)xemacs.org>
writes:
> [...] I think we should focus on common configurations that
exercise
> large blocks of code that differ and aren't really optional. [...]
Are you suggesting that we should merge the four build configurations
we have now into one?
Not necessarily. I think that our most active build platforms
currently are probably Xt/Linux, Xt/MacOSX, Windows/Cygwin, and
Windows/native (this last probably only has one active builder, but I
think it's fair to count Vin = 10000, right? ;-)
We have four different configurations today. I think they are
designed
from another angle. It is easy to add more configurations and cover
different widget sets etc but as you say it might give a maintenance
nightmare.
Well, what I want to do is avoid causing annoying delays for frequent
builders. If nobody complains about a platform, we can pay less
attention to its buildbot, that's all.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta