Re: Python mode failures with xemacs

"Stephen J. Turnbull"<stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes: > David Kastrup writes: > > "Stephen J. Turnbull"<stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes: > > > > > David Kastrup was a little peeved, and I don't blame him. His project > > > can't get merged because they lack assignments for maybe 5% or 10% of > > > the code in AUCTeX, > > > > What makes you think that? I don't think we have significant pieces of > > knowingly unassigned code > > Of course there's very little "knowingly" unassigned code! That's my > point: you've done due diligence until it hurts. Actually stopping short of hurting. > I don't think 5% of the code is "significant" anyway. 10 lines can be significant.