> We use RT 3.4.1 (circa 2004) at work. It supports email just
fine.
Adrian> But isn't RT just a ticketing system for helpdesk type tracking?
I guess so. Our development group (of which I am a part) also use it for
bug tracking. It's not perfect, but it works. From my perspective the
single most important thing about a tracker is that requests not get lost.
RT's search mechanism is clunky. Sometimes I misplace an item, but I can
easily see everything that's assigned to me and use their arcane search form
to find anything else.
Many developers use the RT ticket number to create a named branch for an
application or library when working on a bug. Once the bug is squashed,
that branch gets merged back to CVS head.
I'm no expert on these tools, but helpdesk tracking and bug tracking do have
a lot in common. In our environment an application user may no know much
other than "it's broken". Our admins perform first-level triage. They can
fix some things, especially stuff dealing with networking issues. Other
things they move into the appropriate queue and assign to a developer.
Skip
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta