>>>> "sb" == SL Baur <steve(a)xemacs.org>
writes:
sb> wouldn't things run a tiny bit faster if we ditched the epoch test?
sb> Do we still care about Epoch? If so, why?
We don't. I thought I had expunged all the Epoch code from XEmacs.
Guess I didn't grep hard enough.
./lisp/bytecomp.el:1736: "\t (or (and (boundp 'epoch::version)
epoch::version)\n"
./lisp/bytecomp.el:1752: "\t (or (and (boundp 'epoch::version)
epoch::version)\n"
./lisp/cl.el:103:(defvar cl-emacs-type (cond ((or (and (fboundp 'epoch::version)
./lisp/cl.el:104: (symbol-value 'epoch::version))
./lisp/cl.el:757:(provide 'mini-cl) ; for Epoch
./etc/NEWS:1624:-- Epoch support works. This gets you direct access to some X events
./etc/NEWS:2761:Additional compatibility with Epoch is provided (though this is not yet
./etc/NEWS:2906:Lucid Emacs 19.8 represents the first stage of the Lucid Emacs/Epoch
merger.
./etc/NEWS:2907:The redisplay engine now in lemacs is an improved descendant of the Epoch
./etc/NEWS:4129:analogous to Epoch's "buttons," "zones," and
"styles." An extent is a
./man/xemacs-faq.texi:1405:3 /usr/local/lib/xemacs-19.13/lisp/epoch